Metrik ergonomi untuk produk perangkat lunak permainan pada aspek kenyamanan

Abstract

It is inevitable that humans have a limited ability to interact with a product or technology that is made. Limitations on the human body is the reason the importance of ergonomic aspects need to be implemented in the design of a product. In the field of information technology, research-related metric ergonomics of a product has been focused on hardware products, such as mouse, monitor and keyboard. This study builds a metric measurement of ergonomic comfort aspect to the game software products. This study primarily consists of several steps. First, an analysis of ergonomic aspects in comfort. Second, these aspects are mapped into the attributes that exist in software quality models like McCall, Boehm and ISO 9126/25010. Third, the preparation of ergonomics metrics based on an analysis of the test results in previous stages. Attributes that are considered relevant as a reference for the testing of the game software. Game software predetermined expert / expert tested the user directly to the start of the installation process until the stage play of the game software. From the analysis of the proposed ergonomics testing metrics, generated 11 software attributes offline games based desktop that can characterize whether a software-based desktop offline games comfortable or not.

Keywords

Ergonomi, Metrik kenyamanan, ISO McCall, Boehm, 9126/2510, Atribut kualitas perangkat luna

Categories

How to Cite

[1]
“Metrik ergonomi untuk produk perangkat lunak permainan pada aspek kenyamanan”, MelekIT, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–14, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.30742/melekitjournal.v1i1.35.
PDF Paper (Indonesian)

References

Bevan, Nigel & Azuma, Motoei. (1997). Quality in Use: Incorporating Human Factors into the Software Engineering Lifecyle. IEEE, 169– 179.

Bichteler, J. Technostress in libraries: Causes, effects and solutions. The Electronic Library, 5 (5): 282-287 (1987).

Bridger, R. (2008). Introduction to Ergonomics 2nd Edition. London & New York: Taylor & Francis.

Cohen J (1960). Coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20: 37–46

Finlay, Jacqui; Connor, Dr Andy M.; Pears, Dr Russel (2010). Mining Software Metrics from Jazz. Auckland University of Technology.

Hartini, Entin. (2010). Metode Clustering Hirarki. Pusat Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Komputasi BATAN.

International Ergonomics Association, I. (2002). Definition and Domains of ergonomics. Di akses oktober 09, 2014, from what is Ergonomics: http://www.iea.cc/whats/index.html

NIOSH. (2014). Ergonomic. National Institute of Occupational Safety & Health: http://www.niosh.com.my/

Oborne, D. (1995). Ergonomics at Work, third edition. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

OSHA. OSHA Ergonomics. Diakses 10 juni 2014, the unofficial Guide to the osha: http://www.oshax.org/info/articles/ergonomics

Priyatno, Agus. (6 juni 2010). Estetika dalam seni dan desain. Diakses Januari 13, januari 2014. www.ismanadi.blogspot.com/2010/06/estetika-dalam-seni-dan-desain.html

Rodrigues, H. F. (1993). The Ergonomic Impact of Technology On Libraries. http://web.simmons.edu/ ~chen/nit/NIT'93/93-313-rodri.html

Sutalaksana, D. Z. (1979). Teknik Tata Cara Kerja. Bandung: Jurusan TI - ITB.

Wingjosoebroto. 2000. Ergonomi, Studi Gerak dan Waktu. Jakarta: kanisius.

Yang, Zhonglian; Sun, Shouqian; Chen, Guodong. (2009). Evaluating Sitting Comfort with Questionnaire and Body Pressure Distribution: Overview and Design. IEEE, 1443 – 1447.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.